| news | wto special | information | organisations | presentations | search | discussion board |
| about us | contact us |
When removing asbestos makes no sense

Risk of cancer in USA is barely measurable
U.S. Today Online - Feb 11, 1999

A USA TODAY investigation has found incontrovertible scientific evidence that asbestos in buildings creates a cancer risk so low that it barely can be measured.

A person who spends a career inside a building rich with asbestos materials is more likely to die of a lightning bolt, a bee sting or a toothpick lodged in the throat than an asbestos-related cancer.

Despite the minimal risk, asbestos continues to be removed from U.S buildings at a cost of about $3 billion a year, largely because the risks were overestimated two decades ago and new scientific evidence has never changed the public perception that asbestos in any form is deadly.

The U.S. situation is very different from that in the developing world, where millions of people in mining and manufacturing are exposed to enough asbestos fibers and dust to cause incurable cancer and other diseases.

But in the USA, the amount spent on asbestos removal "makes no sense from a public health standpoint," says Michael Thune, chief epidemiologist at the American Cancer society. "People have a hard time understanding the magnitude of different risks.The risk of getting cancer from asbestos in buildings is so small that eliminating it wouldn't create a measurable blip in the (171,000) lung cancer deaths that occur every year."

Even the fiercest critics of asbestos doubt the wisdom of removing it from buildings.

"I'm sure you expect me to say, 'Take it out!' " says David Egilman, a Brown University doctor who is a critic of the asbestos industry and a frequent expert witness for workers suing asbestos companies. "But that would be lunacy, and I'm not a lunatic. There are far better ways to spend our money."

Adds Tim Flood, an epidemiologist at the Arizona Health Department: "Asbestos abatement is pretty much a fiasco. It's hard to think of a worse investment." Many more lives would be saved, Flood Says, if the money were spent on drug prevention, guardrails, sunscreen, medical research -- "almost anything, really."

Indoor radon will cause 3,000 times as many deaths. Driving will kill 20,000 times more people. Smoking will kill 50,000 times as many.

For each life saved, asbestos removal costs $ 100 million to $500 million.

Pages > 1 2 3 4 5

Return to News index