EPA's SHIFTING STAND
Although asbestos has faded from the front page, its removal continues
at roughly the same pace, costing $3 billion to $4 billion a year
the past decade, says Olin Jennings, a Columbia, N.J., consultant
who has tracked asbestos-related spending. In addition to the $50
billion spent so far, Jennings predicts $50 billion more will be
spent before the cleanup winds down in 20 years.
"It's steady industry, but it's not as lucrative as it once was
because so many people jumped on the bandwagon. It not very competitive
in the 1990s," he says.
Epidemiologists-doctors who study risks-are especially frustrated
that asbestos spending has continued despite broad agreement among
scientists that it's a waste of money. The folly is largely the
result of a fear of lawsuits and bad advice from the Environmental
Protection Agency in the early days of the asbestos scare, before
scientists had enough evidence to judge the risks.
When the death toll to industrial workers from asbestos became
clear, the EPA rushed to act. In 1979, the EPA published a book
of guidance on asbestos, commonly called the Orange Book for the
eye-catching color of its cover. It said the only permanent solution
to asbestos in buildings was to take it out.
In 1983, the EPA issued an updated book, the Blue Book, which
declared that removal was "always appropriate, never inappropriate."
That policy has been followed, more or less, ever since, despite
backtracking by the EPA as scientific evidence accumulated that
the dangers were not as great as feared.
In 1985, the EPA published the Purple Book, which emphasized "managing
asbestos" rather than removing it.
In 1990, the EPA issued the Green Book, which said asbestos in
schools and offices presented a low risk. It noted that improper
asbestos removal could increase exposure by stirring up dust unnecessarily.
But the EPA has never made a dramatic announcement or an effort
to reverse the multibillion-dollar asbestos effort that its early
pronouncements sparked.
Congress passed the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act in
1986. It ordered school districts to locate all asbestos in their
buildings and create a plan to manage it. It also imposed tight
regulations on asbestos removal, raising costs and ensuring that
the image of asbestos-removal workers in spacesuits would keep fears
high.
Jennings estimate that 15% to 33% of spending on asbestos removal
has been in schools. New York City schools have spent more than
$100 million.
But starting in 1985, a flow of scientific studies began questioning
the wisdom asbestos removal. The studies appeared in the most respected
publications, including Science and the New England Journal of Medicine.
|