| news | wto special | information | organisations | presentations | search | discussion board |
| about us | contact us |
Eco-friendly asbestos cement

 

A comparison of some Inorganic Carcinogens

Industry

Chemical/ likely chemical

Cancer type

Relative risk range

Chromate production

Hexavalent chromium

Respiratory (mostly lung)

2 - 80

Chromium pigment production

Hexavalent chromium

Respiratory (mostly lung)

1.4 - 67

Chromium plating

Hexavalent chromium

Respiratory (mostly lung)

1.4 - 4.3

Ferrochromium production

Hexavalent chromium

Respiratory (mostly lung)

1.0 - 6.6

Nickel refining

Various nickel compounds

Lung

0.9 - 12.4

Nickel refining

Various nickel compounds

Nasal sinuses

131 - 782

Beryllium production

Various beryllium compounds

Lung

1.25 - 2.86

Nickel/cadmium battery production

Cadmium oxide, nickel compounds

Lung

1.0 - 1.5

Cadmium recovery

Cadmium compounds

Lung

0.3 - 4.7

Asbestos cement production

Chrysotile asbestos

Lung

0.91 - 1.58

Asbestos mining and milling

Chrysotile asbestos

Lung

1.39

Asbestos textile manufacture

Chrysotile asbestos

Lung

1.97

Friction material production

Chrysotile asbestos

Lung

0.93 - 1.49

Mixed asbestos product production

Chrysotile asbestos

Lung

1.86 - 5.3

Manufacture

Mixed amphibole asbestos

Lung

0.53 - 8.44

Manufacture

Amosite

Lung

6.29

Insulation

Mixed amphibole asbestos

Lung

2.38 - 7.0

Ship yards

Mixed amphibole asbestos

Lung

0.84 - 3.07

Please note that since the exposure levels (and even the chemical entities of the exposure) vary between different studies and different industries, these figures do not give any indication of the carciogenic potency of the chemicals. They simply describe observed cancer risks. The figures in the 4th column give the relative risk of the exposed populations when the risk of a non exposed population is 1.

 

<< PREVIOUS

 

 
Download this document
(PDF format 30k)

Return to Asbestos v/s Substitutes