| news | wto special | information | organisations | presentations | search | discussion board |
| about us | contact us |
Findings bring relief to Rs 1,000-CR local industry


Asbestos not an ecological hazard, claims Indian NGO
Economic Times - Aug 2, 2000.


   

NEW DELHI: An Indian NGO has claimed that asbestos, long considered to be a dangerous substance is less harmful that its substitutes like plastics and metals.

The NGO, Nature One, whose claims have been contradicted by Greenpeace, has cited evidence and said asbestos cement pipes and sheets can play a vital role in providing cost effective, durable and safe and energy-efficient housing. In India a Rs 1000 crore industry is languishing due to the perception that asbestos is bad for health, says Nature One.

According to Nature One, asbestos is and occupational carcinogen, implying that workers handling asbestos over a long period can develop cancer. But it is not an environmental or ecological hazard., says Nature One's Joy Manglani. However people who work in Asbestos mines without proper safety measures have a high risk of developing cancer or dying of lung disease.

But Asbestos is not a hazard when used in cement or as water pipes, according to some studies. The World Health Organisation had concluded in 1991 that with respect to asbestos cement pipes, ingested asbestos was not hazardous to health and it is unnecessary to recommend a health-based guideline for asbestos in drinking water.

Even the US, which was the first to wake up to the hazards of workers dying of asbestos exposure in the early 80's, has stopped considering asbestos hazardous, says Manglani. Investigations in the US have shown that the risk of cancer from asbestos is buildings was so low that it was barely measurable. Apparently, a person who spends his life inside a building rich with asbestos is more likely to die of causes other than asbestos-related cancer.

But despite a repeal of ban on asbestos cement pipes, and new evidence that the risks were overestimated, asbestos is not used in buildings in the US and is costing over $3 billion a year, admits Joy Manglani.

According to Manglani, the manufacturing process for asbestos cement products was environment friendly because it does not involve any hazardous chemical reaction, no heating is required and there are no effluents or emissions. Substitutes like ductile iron and PVC were more dangerous. PVC pipes can release lead and politicizes and corrosion from iron pipes can contaminate water.

Refuting Nature One's claims, Greenpeace scientist, David Santillo, said gastrointestinal cancer seems to be the most common factor of cancer which correlates with exposure to elevated asbestos fibres in drinking water supplies. "The magnitudes of the increases cancer incidence are generally small, and it is always difficult to eliminate confounding factors such as smoking, but some increase does seem fairly consistent phenomenon, " Santillo says.

- Nivedita Prabhu

 


Return to News index